In the last year Napier & Blakeley

It’s rare to find nothing that would be considered problematic for an incoming owner, but the last few years there have been a few issues that have become commonplace through either lack of ongoing investment and maintenance or as a result of new market legislation.

The GFC brought substantial financial constraints to the entire economy but for property owners it brought pressures through loan to value ratios (LVR’s), reductions in value and rental income. This created a catch 22 situation where many knew they had to keep maintaining and spending capital to keep their assets compliant, relevant and therefore rentable, but were unable to directly fund or borrow funds to do so.

We recently re-analysed an asset that we had prepared due diligence and capex forecasts for a few years ago, and the list of items that we identified in our initial report were almost completely the same as now. Nothing had been fixed, maintained or repositioned. So, many years down the track the asset has fallen deeper into redundancy and therefore costs more to rectify.

The other more recent trend that has pretty well become standard during due diligence is the of analysis of energy consumption and modelling future asset potential to reduce energy. This trend is driven by rent, NABERS disclosure legislation and also with the future cost of energy in mind.

Over the last 2 years the federal Government ran the Green Building Fund initiative which provided up to 50% of the expenditure required by an owner to sustainably retrofit their asset.

This initiative was worth approximately $120m so therefore an overall value of retrofitting projects of $240m. We estimate conservatively that there could be well in excess of $2b worth of retrofit requirements, especially when you consider that 35-40% of the rental marketplace are Government type tenants that require minimum 4 to 4.5 star NABERS rated assets to lease. As an example, there are many Premium and A Grade commercial offices that are substantially below that level of rating, some hovering at around a 1 star NABERS rating.

Contact

If you want further information on due diligence and capital expenditure forecasts, or any other Napier & Blakeley services please contact any of our offices below:

Melbourne - Rob Howells            03 9915 6300             rhowells@napierblakeley.com
Sydney – Gavin Peach                02 9299 1899              gpeach@napierblakeley.com

Napier & Blakely services:

• Technical Due Diligence
• Capital Expenditure Planning
• Quantity Surveying
• Strategic Asset Management
• Building & Sustainability Consulting
• Property Depreciation

Reduced Life Expectancy and Premature Capex
Recent technical due diligence and condition assessments have also found that the lack of R&M and Capex budgets for economic life driven plant and equipment overhauls and refurbishments has resulted in increased short and medium term Capex.

To put this in context, without appropriate R&M, major plant items may have an economic expected life of (say) 25 years, however the reduction of removal of maintenance can result in a major shortfall in expected life to around 15 years.

The Reaction
Astute purchasers have become aware of this risk and look for these patterns in their technical due diligence reporting to ensure that appropriate Capex costs are factored into the purchase price to account for a vendor’s R&M expenditure shortfalls. 

Condition assessments, maintenance reviews, energy assessments and risk weighted strategic Capex forecasts have become 2010’s essential tools for good asset and facility management and sustainable property solutions. 

Risk of Non-Compliance 
New legislation requires that most commercial office property will be required to have a formal energy performance rating in the next few years and many will require this imminently or in the next few months.  This Legislation has caught most by surprise.  The Building Energy Efficiency Disclosure Act 2010 has just been introduced with transitional provisions (1 November 2010 to 30 October 2011) requiring the disclosure of a building’s energy performance through a NABERS Energy base or whole building rating, for all commercial office property with a net lettable area of 2,000sqm or more that is offered for sale or lease. 

Anxious Vendors
With fines in excess of $100,000 for breaches of the Act’s obligations; including advertising the property for sale or lease, after November 1 2010 without an appropriate NABERS Energy rating, there is significant anxiety in the market place.  The latest information from the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE) will surely increase anxiety levels, as they have confirmed that neither exemptions nor extensions will be granted for lack of knowledge or where assessments are currently underway but not yet completed.

 It will be interesting to see how owners, selling and leasing agents and DCCEE react. 

Astute Purchasers
The story doesn’t end once the rating has been achieved.  Purchasers want to know about the processes and procedures that owners have in place, the potential risks of maintaining the rating at the current level and what plans are in place, or could be implemented, to improve the rating, perhaps strategically in line with planned Capex or future lease expires.

Such initiatives are considered in terms of funding opportunities, reduced energy costs, pay back periods and commercial outcomes. 

Published in the Brisbane Legal Magazine November 25, 2010

Lack of Capital post GFC has lead to a significant neglect of R&M and Capex spend.

Having worked on property due diligence valued over $10B since the GFC, Napier & Blakeley have seen only nominal spend on upkeep compared with previous years.

Risk of Non-Compliance (i)

During this period the increasing trend has been a notable reduction of Repair and Maintenance (R&M) and Capital Expenditure (Capex)  budgets. Whilst this strategy may have been necessary in some circumstances e.g. postponement of non-essential Capex, we have found too commonly evidence of non-compliance regarding statutory maintenance such as testing, auditing and reporting of essential safety measures and fire safety systems.

Reduced Life Expectancy and Premature Capex 

Recent technical due diligence and condition assessments have also found that the lack of R&M and Capex budgets for economic life driven plant and equipment overhauls and refurbishments has resulted in increased short and medium term Capex.

To put this in context, without appropriate R&M, major plant items may have an economic expected life of (say) 25 years, however, the reduction or removal of maintenance can result in a major shortfall in expected life to around 15 years.

The Reaction

Astute purchasers have become aware of this risk and look for these patterns in their technical due diligence reporting to ensure that appropriate Capex costs are factored into the purchase price to account for a vendor’s R&M expenditure shortfalls.

Condition assessments, maintenance reviews, energy assessments and risk weighted strategic Capex forecasts have become 2010’s essential tools for good asset and facility management and sustainable property solutions.

Risk of Non-Compliance (ii)

Legislation requires that most commercial office property will be required to have a formal energy performance rating in the next few years and many will require this imminently or in the next few months.

This Legislation has caught most by surprise.

For purchasers and owners it is now important to understand where a property currently sits from a formally rated energy performance perspective.

It is also important to understand how the rating can be maintained at the same level over a period of time, and how it can be strategically and cost effectively improved to avoid future obsolescence.

The Building Energy Efficiency Disclosure Act 2010 is on the cusp of taking effect. The transitional provisions (1 November 2010 to 30 October 2011) require the disclosure of a building’s energy performance through a NABERS Energy base or whole building rating, for all commercial office property with a net lettable area of 2,000m² or more that is offered for sale or lease. However, with only 388 commercial office buildings registered nationally to date, it would seem the message may not have reached all concerned parties with property interests that fall under the Act’s disclosure requirements.

Anxious Vendors

With fines in excess of $110,000 for breaches of the Act’s obligations; including advertising the property for sale or lease, after 1 November 2010 without an appropriate NABERS Energy rating, there is significant anxiety in the market place.

The latest information from the Department of Climate Change and Energy Efficiency (DCCEE) will surely increase anxiety levels, as they have confirmed that neither exemptions nor extensions will be granted for lack of knowledge or where assessments are currently underway but not yet completed.

It will be interesting to see how owners, selling and leasing agents and DCCEE react.

Astute Purchasers

The story doesn’t end once the rating has been achieved. Purchasers want to know about the processes and procedures that owners have in place, the potential risks of maintaining the rating at the current level and what plans are in place, or could be implemented, to improve the rating, perhaps strategically in line with planned Capex or future lease expiries. Such initiatives are considered in terms of funding opportunities, reduced energy costs, pay back periods and commercial outcomes.

For more information on Technical Due Diligence, Capex Forecasts, NABERS Ratings and Sustainable Property Solutions contact Napier & Blakeley.

NSW / ACT / WA / NZ  -  Alastair Walker  -  02 9299 1899
VIC /  SA  / TAS  -  Peter Frith, Rob Howells -  03 9915 6300