Damage to property and buildings

Notwithstanding the substantial number of properties that suffered as a result of the recent floods, the most common building disaster in Australia is fire, so it is important to be prepared. Luckily we have only had one earthquake in recent history and although the chances of these occurrences are low, the devastation they can do has been clearly seen in Christchurch.Napier & Blakeley’s property reinstatement cost assessments determine the amount a property needs to be insured for to cover the possibility of damage or complete destruction from a disaster. This should include the demolition of the remaining component of the property followed by the reconstruction and all associated fees, such as design, management and permit fees.

In conjunction with recent meteorological events construction markets nationally have gone through significant changes in cost in recent years. A number of years ago costs increased significantly and in some markets in more recent times costs have gone backwards. So it is now more important than ever to accurately update insurable costs.

Fire or disaster can have a direct impact on business operations within a building and many building owners do not adequately factor items such as loss of profits or business interruption into the building insurance equation, leaving themselves under insured.

Over insurance can also be detrimental to business performance. Insuring a property for more than its true worth provides no tangible benefit and may increase the building’s outgoings unnecessarily.

Our reports ensure that you are insured for the right amount and the assessments we provide take many factors into account in determining the cost of reinstating property.  Our quantity surveyors are experts in determining the true demolition and reconstruction costs of a property.

Valuers value, architects design and builders build, but none are real cost experts.

A qualified quantity surveyor is the only qualified construction cost professional capable of determining construction costs of buildings.

Related Topic on Napier & Blakeley Blog  
Property Depreciation and Natural Disasters

Contact

If you want further information on Property Reinstatement Cost Assessments, or any other Napier & Blakeley services please contact any of our offices below:

Melbourne - Craig Smith                   
03 9915 6300                           
csmith@napierblakeley.com 

Sydney - Peter Hammond                
02 9299 1899                    
phammond@napierblakeley.com 

Brisbane - Paul Cosker                     
07 3221 8255                           
pcosker@napierblakeley.com

Napier & Blakeley services: 

• Technical Due Diligence
• Capital Expenditure Planning
• Quantity Surveying
• Strategic Asset Management
• Building & Sustainability Consulting
• Property Depreciation

Damage to property and buildings by fire and other disasters, natural or otherwise, costs Australians hundreds of millions of dollars every year. In Australia, the most common building disaster is fire, so it is important to be prepared.

Napier & Blakeley’s fire insurance assessments are called reinstatement cost assessments. The function of these assessments is to determine the amount a property needs to be insured, to cover the possibility of damage from a disaster. This can include the demolition of the remaining component of the property followed by reconstruction.

Construction markets nationally have gone through significant upturns in cost in recent years. While the increase in these costs may have slowed, they are still far greater than they were a few years ago.

Fire or disaster can have a direct impact on the business operations within a building and many building owners do not adequately factor items such as loss of profits or business interruption into the building insurance equation, leaving themselves under insured.

Over insurance is equally detrimental to business performance. Insuring a property for more than its true worth provides no tangible benefit and may increase the building’s outgoings unnecessarily.

Napier & Blakeley will ensure you are insured for the right amount. The assessments we provide take many factors into account in determining the cost of reinstating property. Our quantity surveyors are capable of determining the true demolition and reconstruction costs of a property. Valuers value, architects design and builders build, but none are real cost experts

Full assessments by Napier & Blakeley are vital in analysing the true extent of loss in the event of a disaster and enable property owners to secure the right insurance cover at the best available premium.  Our quantity surveyors are skilled in the area of construction costs and have daily exposure to changes in the marketplace affecting labour, materials and procurement.

The recent warehouse fire in the Brisbane suburb of Sherwood should send a significant warning to property owners and managers about property replacement cost assessments. The damage to the Sherwood warehouse was massive. From a property owner’s perspective, it was critical that they were not under-insured.

Unfortunately, all too often we see companies that lose their assets (due to fire, flooding etc) without first ensuring they are adequately insured. This is an expensive mistake.

Everyday, property owners are at risk of under-insurance due to a variety of factors. The case study below demonstrates the difference between an insurance replacement cost assessment prepared by a qualified Quantity Surveyor and a property valuation estimate.

The example is based on a 10,000m2 property which has a 4,000m2 industrial building, including a 500m2 office component.

The above example is commonly found when discussing costs and risks with our property owner clients. Inadequate insurance cover leads to the property owner essentially becoming a co-insurer of the property and often relates to protracted negotiations in the event of a claim. This ratio (50% under-insurance in the above example) still applies if there is only a partial damage or loss.

In the other extreme, excess insurance cover provides no benefit to the insurer and will unnecessarily increase the asset’s outgoings.

Insurance against fire and related perils can be extended to cover the breakdown of plant and machinery. An analysis of the plant to be insured, including an assessment of its reinstatement cost and current condition, can also be provided. Properties with multiple buildings on one site should have separate replacement costs for each building and ownership of tenant fitouts needs to be taken into account. These fitouts can, in some cases, equate to a similar cost to the base building, especially when the fitout includes a high value of plant and equipment.

Napier & Blakeley have an extensive database of properties including over 4,000 industrial properties in Queensland. Many of our clients ask us to prepare an accurate assessment initially and then provide annual desktop updates based on construction cost indices and forecasts. More thorough reviews need to be completed after a few years of general indexed updates or when there have been significant changes to the asset or the legislative environment. These include tenant fitouts, renovations or extensions, changes to the BCA and significant variations to the material/labour supply in the local market. Napier & Blakeley will protect you from the substantial risks of under insuring your assets.